Golden Rule

Test 6 including zemanta images

by Marcus Goodyear on August 5, 2009

One of many Google signs
Image by Extra Ketchup via Flickr

Business as Mission Network has posted a very interesting article last week: Acknowledging Faith in the Workplace – Jon Vanverloch of Google (hattip: Transforming Marketplace Ministry). Reading through Jon’s thoughts and verses, I found myself nodding my head in agreement and wanting to hear more. I wanted Jon to tell us what he thinks faith in the workplace looks like at Google. Also, maybe what it should look like.

I agree with him that secular businesses are often ambivalent. Sometimes hostile. But I wonder if acknowledging God in the workplace isn’t more about sharing God when appropriate.

For instance, I love my wife. My relationship with her and my family is incredibly important to me. Sometimes, when I am at work, I talk about marriage in general and my wife specifically. But often it doesn’t come up. This doesn’t mean I don’t love her. It doesn’t mean I’ve been unfaithful. It just means I’m meeting deadlines, assigning articles, cleaning up code, and all of the daily tasks that go with online publishing and marketing for TheHighCalling.org, HighCallingBlogs.com, FaithInTheWorkPlace.com, and all the other programs of the Foundations for Laity Renewal.

And that’s okay.

I think of my relationship with God in the same way.

As a former public school teacher, mostly I just taught English and literature and writing. I wouldn’t describe that work environment as hostile, but we had to be careful. Of course, I made no secret of my faith, just as I made no secret of my marital status. But I tried not to use my teaching job as a pulpit. It just didn’t feel fair to the students given the power structure of the public classroom. I think bosses can find themselves in similarly problematic power relationships. Despite my best intentions, I’m sure I made some students uncomfortable, but I tried hard to let them know what I believed without putting pressure on them to believe what I believe. I just was honest about who I am. And I encouraged them to be honest in the same way.

That could sound like I was being wishy-washy. I don’t mean it that way. (In fact, I actually talked about faith in depth with many students on their own initiative.) The point is this: my employer hired me to teach the kids English. They didn’t hire me to convert the students to Christianity. In order to honor God, my primary purpose during the school day needed to honor my employee’s needs. They needed a good teacher, not a preacher.

Though as far as that goes, every year I did enjoy dressing up like Jonathan Edwards and threatening all of my students with hellfire and brimstone and the fickleness of an angry God. That was one day when I played the role of preacher with great relish.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Hurricane

Test 5 – from GoodWordEditing

by Marcus Goodyear on August 5, 2009

Despite the title of this blog, I don’t talk about the nuts and bolts of editing as often as I should. What I do instead, is talk about the content ideas that I edit–Christianity and the daily living. A few days ago, Mary DeMuth pinned me down and interviewed me about editing for TheHighCalling.org, an online magazine about faith and work. You can read the full interview on Mary’s site, So You Want To Be Published. Here’s a quick excerpt.

MARY: What type of writer are you looking for there [at TheHighCalling.org]?

ME: Our ideal writer has talent, insight, online platform, and name recognition. It’s not something we often get, but it is always my primary goal.

Thus the title of this post. Four things that define marketable writers.

  1. Talent/Craft – Spend 10,000 hours at something and you will develop some real talent. I suggest 1-2 hours a day for a decade or two. Seriously. Hone your craft. Learn what makes a good sentence by reading a lot and writing a lot. Blogs are a great classroom for learning the craft in my opinion. You get quick feedback on the effectiveness of your posts to motivate readers.
  2. Insight - As much as I value a writer who understands sentences and paragraphs, I need substance over style. I don’t like intensive editorial rewrites, but if a person’s ideas are good enough, I have done that on a few occasions. I think of it this way: A good editor can clean up the style if the content is good, but an editor can’t add substance to sentences that say nothing.
  3. Platform - Publishers want to know who your audience is. They are looking for writers who bring a ready market. More and more web publishers will be looking for the same thing. How many people read your blog (and could click on a link to your article if you posted one)? How many people subscribe to your Twitter feed (and could click on a link to your article if you posted one)? How many Facebook friends, etc. In a perfect world good writing would stand on its own. The reality is that magazines and publishers have to pay attention to the size of an author’s current market.
  4. Name Recognition - This is related to platform. Where online platform can be an active driver of traffic, name recognition is more about credibility for the site. Some authors have great online name recognition but weak online platform. (Eugene Peterson is an example.) Other authors have great online platform, but weak name recognition. (I won’t give an example of this because I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.)

The real question for writers is this: Which of these four areas do you need the most work? If your craft and insight needs work, then nothing else matters. Don’t worry about platform or name recognition. Just write and read like a crazy person for the next ten years.

If you’ve already done that, then think about realistic ways to develop your platform. Although social media has not yet proven helpful for selling books, it can generate an online platform that is useful for online publications.

Which leaves us finally with name recognition. I don’t know how to develop this except to just keep in the business. Hone your speaking skills. Help others. Work hard. Start local.

As an editor, I know when I’ve found someone with all four elements. As a writer, I keep working on my craft and my insights.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 0 comments }

Test 4 – Message in a bottle

August 5, 2009
Band of Brothers

L.L. here, with Random Acts of Poetry. Standing on a proverbial seashore, prying open a mysterious bottle.
This is the metaphor Edward Hirsch uses to describe the experience of reading poetry (okay, he’s using an image from Celan, but let’s not get too complicated). Says Hirsch in How to Read a Poem: And Fall in Love [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Test 1 – Web Conference

August 5, 2009
Blue tent thumb

Marcus here. I read an interesting statistic a few months ago that has changed the way I think about my work online. A Pew report about Networked Families concluded that “Technology now permeates American households and has become a central feature of families’ day-to-day lives.”
Think about that for a minute.
Technology is something we take for [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Hello world!

June 12, 2009
Simpsons Chris

Welcome to HighCallingBlogs.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!
Marcus Goodyear at GoodWordEditing.com, Gordon Atkinson at HighCallingBlogs.com/rlp and Chris Cree at SuccessCREEations are the hosts of this community. Don’t hesitate to contact them with any questions.

1 comment Read the full article →